HOME SHORT TAKES OUR ESSAYS PODCASTS LINKS ABOUT US CAU  Subscribe MTC on Facebook  Find us on Twitter

OUR ESSAYS


April 15, 2012

Yes, Professors Work Hard, But...

                        By Charlotte Allen

Do college professors work harder than other upper-middle-class Americans, or less hard? Former college president David C. Levy's March 23 op-ed in the Washington Post, arguing that faculty members ought to increase their classroom time by up to 67 percent, ignited a fierce debate in academe. Levy's op-ed alone generated 1,352 comments online, mostly from professors insisting that they work very hard, what with preparing for classes, grading papers, meeting with students, sitting on committees, and doing the scholarly research that enabled them to win tenure and thus keep their jobs.

On academic blogs Levy was excoriated as a "moron" and a "liar," to quote two of the nicer things said about him. On the other side, Andrew Gillen, now with the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, wrote a post for us here at Minding the Campus that included data showing that teaching loads for tenured and tenure-track faculty had fallen significantly from 1988 to 2004. Even at two-year community colleges, where teaching, not research, is supposed to be nearly the whole focus of faculty energy, the mean teaching load fell from 4.5 courses per semester to just over four courses. The lucky souls with jobs at elite "R1" public and private research universities were teaching a little over 1.5 courses per semester, in contrast to the nearly three courses per semester they would have taught back in 1988.

So--who is right? Levy and Gillen, or their numerous critics in academia? My answer is: They're both right. The issue isn't so much whether college professors are lazy--or whether, as Levy asserts, they're mentally living back in the elbow-patch days of the early twentieth century when academics reputedly traded genteel poverty for ultra-genteel campus working hours that were as much consumed with taking tea and sipping sherry as standing in classrooms trying to pound knowledge into the heads of dimwits wearing raccoon coats.

I think that most college faculty work darned hard (there are lazy exceptions, but they are relatively few in these days of rapidly diminishing tenure and promotion possibilities). I believe the commenter to Levy's Washington Post op-ed who wrote: "I'm a professor at a smallish liberal arts college in the South, and I work 7 days a week usually until 1:00am--yes, taking out four hours of the day to eat and spend with my wife and child. And I work all Christmas 'break' and all summer, too." I think that Levy was simply wrong when he asserted that most college faculty spend only one hour on "grading and class preparation" for every hour they spend inside a classroom. That's impossible--unless you are teaching from crumbling notes that predate the invention of the electric typewriter and your assignments consist of a single multiple-choice exam at finals time.

Professors Work Like Industrious Students

The issue isn't underworked professors. It's whether the hard work that professors do perform is something that society wants to continue paying for. This is especially an issue at public universities and community colleges where the dollars of taxpayers are a major source of support for professorial livelihoods that may include diminished teaching loads compared with the hours they might have put in two decades ago. The parents and taxpayers who support public universities tend to think that what they're subsidizing is the instruction of undergraduates. Then, those same parents and taxpayers are shocked to discover that what they're actually subsidizing is the lifestyle of a community of scholars. It's a demanding lifestyle--nowadays you've typically got to publish not one but two scholarly books just to qualify for tenure--and the hours can be punishing at times, but they in no way resemble the 40-hour work-week day in and day out of most other people with full-time jobs.

What the working life of college professors most closely resembles is the working life of their most industrious students: disciplined day-to-day class preparation for the first thirteen weeks of the semester, followed by two round-the-clock weeks of sleep-deprived toil (writing term papers and studying for finals for the students, grading said papers and computing final grades for the professors)--and then, vacation! Three solid weeks for the Christmas holidays and three solid months over the summer (plus, during the semester, a week of spring break and an ever-increasing number of days off just before Thanksgiving). True, that vast amount of what looks to outsiders like leisure time is often completely taken up by scholarly research, keeping up with the journals, writing syllabi for the next semester, delivering papers at academic conferences, sifting through the resumes of job applicants, and shepherding undergraduates through summer-abroad field trips. But professors, unlike other professionals obliged to maintain standard 40-hour workweeks whether they like it or not, are free to attend to their obligations at their own pace and structure their time accordingly. They can stay up until 1 a.m. five nights in a row binge-writing a scholarly article--and then crash for the next five days. Furthermore, much of what college professors do, arduous though it may be, might not look like "work" in the eyes of many people outside academia.

I'll pick an example from my own limited experience as an academic. During the summer of 2010, I participated in an invitation-only six-week summer seminar in Tunis sponsored (and mostly paid for) by the National Endowment for the Humanities. Of the sixteen participants, fourteen were faculty members at institutions ranging from elite "R-1" research universities to small liberal-arts colleges. I got to know them fairly well, and I can testify that they were uniformly brilliant (as well they should have been, since they were chosen from more than 120 people who had applied for the seminar), conscientious, hard-working, and dedicated to their teaching as well as their scholarship.

For much of the seminar we pored over a close reading of the "Confessions" of Augustine of Hippo, who had lived in Carthage, the ancient city adjacent to modern Tunis. The insights of those theologians, philosophers, literary scholars, archaeologists, and historians were often dazzling. During our "off" days we toured Tunisia's impressive and well-preserved Roman ruins with a local archaeologist as our guide. Those trips were time-consuming and sometimes brutal, since summer temperatures in Tunisia's scorching interior regularly reach 120 degrees. And during whatever spare hours remained many of the participating professors worked in their rooms to prepare their classes for the upcoming fall semester. Others flew off to conferences where they delivered papers.

The NEH seminar, generating a deeper understanding of what Augustine was about, undoubtedly helped make its participants better teachers and better scholars. But I couldn't help wondering what an outsider might think of the whole operation: How exactly is this different from one of those high-priced, professor-led educational cruises that many universities sponsor for their well-heeled alumni--or from the week-long Great Books summer seminars that St. Johns University holds in Santa Fe for $2,500 or so a pop? One professor in our group gave a paper in Tuscany. Wouldn't it be great to spend a weekend in Tuscany as part of your job? And the point isn't simply that professors can get paid for what can look to outsiders like a high-end, mind-improving vacation. It's that they have weeks of unstructured time in which to do so.

So the problem isn't that college professors don't work hard--clearly most do. The problem is that the working lives they lead more closely resemble the working lives of writers, artists, and musical composers than they do of the working lives of other upper-middle-class professionals: odd hours and feast-or-famine working schedules; bursts of creative intensity punctuated by relative idleness, long periods that can strike outsiders as unproductive but that actually generate intense creativity down the road. Someone--students, parents, taxpayers, managers of university endowments--has to pay for this sort of lifestyle, of course. Someone has to judge whether one of its end results--reams of scholarship that, as Mark Bauerlein has argued on Minding the Campus--may be "superb" in quality but seldom gets read or cited--is worth all the expenditures and the apparent waste.

Some, like David C. Levy, argue that it's not, and that most institutions of higher learning would be better off if professors focused solely on the teaching that most people assume is their sole job and in the name of efficiency taught five courses per semester all year round. Others argue that such an approach would kill the university as a locus of the life of the mind. Supporting a university faculty is in many ways analogous to supporting a symphony orchestra or an art gallery--and the ultimate question is how many of those a society is willing or able to support.



Comments (3)

Dean from Ohio:

Best single article I've read on this issue in a long time. Thanks!

Americans have a fine nose for unfairness, and that sense is quickly activated by well-paid laziness of surly and petty people who have power over us. That, and maybe a little covetousness of said laziness, seem to make a deep impression on the observer's memory. Perhaps that's why all of us have anecdotes about such professors.

Terry C:

I agree. I think one of the reasons is that we carry things around with us, mentally. We sit around thinking about how to teach something better, or wonder why students aren't getting something and how we can make it more clear.

"Bursts of creative intensity punctuated by relative idleness, long periods that can strike outsiders as unproductive but that actually generate intense creativity down the road"

I think is really, spot on. We are thinking, when we appear to be doing nothing, and that is a different kind of work than something that has a physical, tangible product.

Juan:

Before taking the leap and signing any papers for a student loan here are some key facts on the various types of loans that are out there today. Student loans fall into two categories, namely federal loans and private loans. Federal loans are subject to oversight and regulations by the federal government. They include the following: Stafford loans are federally guaranteed, low-fixed-interest-rate loans that must be repaid by the student. There are two types of Stafford loans – subsidized and unsubsidized. The federal government will pay the interest on the loan while the student is still in college. Payment on the loan is due six months after the student graduates, stops attending school or drops below half-time status. The interest rate for the 2010-2011 academic year on a Subsidized Stafford loan is 4. 5 percent. Undergraduate students may borrow up to $4,000 per academic year and up to $20,000 in total. Graduate students may borrow up to $6,000 per year with a cap of $40,000. The student is responsible for all the interest from the time the loan is disbursed to the time the loan is repaid in full. The student does, however, have the option to defer paying interest until six months after graduation or six months after dropping below half-time status. If this option is taken, the interest is accrued and added to the principle loan balance and interest begins to accrue on the new principle loan balance. The student will essentially pay interest on interest, which can be costly. The interest rate for the 2010-2011 academic year on a Unsubsidized Federal Stafford loan is 6. 8 percent. Federal Perkins loans are low-fixed-interest-rate-educational loans funded by the federal government and administrated by the school. The loans are awarded to undergraduates and graduate students who have exceptional financial need. Students are not charged any fee (origination fees) to take out the loan, and there is a 10-year repayment period. The interest rate for the 2010-2011 academic year is 5 percent. The federal government pays all the interest while the student is in school and repayment begins nine months after graduating, leaving school or dropping below half-time status. Even though a Perkins loan is a federal loan, repayment of the loan is made directly to the school. The Federal Plus Loans are not based on financial need. Parents of dependent undergraduate students who are enrolled at least half time may take out the loan. The loan allows a parent to borrow the total cost of undergraduate education in order to supplement the student’s financial aid package and is paid back by the parent. Federal Plus Loans have a fixed interest rate of 8. 5 percent and are subject to passing federal guidelines for credit worthiness. Repayment of the loan generally begins 60 days after the funds have been completely disbursed. The parent has up to 10 years to pay off the loan. Interest accrues immediately on the loan and payments will include both interest and principle. Parents are charged a 4 percent fee to take out the loan, which is made up of a 3 percent origination fee and a 1 percent federal default fee. All federal student loans require that the students fill out a FAFSA. (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) application. The FAFSA is a free form from the federal government that is used to collect a student’s personal and financial data. For information about FAFSA and Federal Financial Aid, visit . fafsa. ed. gov/. Private loans are another source of funds to pay for college. Private lenders like commercial banks typically offer these loans. These loans are generally used when government based and/or parent loans do not provide enough aid to cover the cost of college. Standard features on such loans include flexible repayment options and greater loan limits. Unlike federal loans, private loans do not require students to fill out a FAFSA application. These loans generally have higher fees and interest rates and do not offer opportunities for cancellation or loan forgiveness that are available on many federal loan programs. When the need to take out a private student loan becomes a necessary, compare agreements offered by lenders and see which ones would be most appropriate for you. Ask about the interest rate, the flexible repayment options and the application fees. Taking out loans for your college education is a worthy justification for debt; however, it is a serious long-term financial commitment. It is important that you understand the various loans options that are available so you can choose the ones that are best suited for you.Remember loans must be paid back on a timely basis. When you stay on top of your student loan, you will avoid paying late fees, extra interest costs and protects your credit rating.

Post a comment

Leave comments here. Unless they are vicious or obscene, they will be printed.


MONTHLY ARCHIVES:

 

RECENT ESSAYS

Texas Leads the Way on Higher-Ed Accountability
Thomas K. Lindsay

More Decline in the U. of Chicago Core
Adam Kissel

Do We Over-Invest in Non-Traditional Students?
Richard Vedder

The Liberal Arts Are in Trouble--Should We Celebrate?: Part 2
Symposium

The Liberal Arts Are in Trouble--Should We Celebrate?
Symposium

All Essays >>>

Professors and Tenure

Published by the Manhattan Institute
The Manhattan Insitute's Center for the American University.