HOME SHORT TAKES OUR ESSAYS PODCASTS LINKS ABOUT US CAU  Subscribe MTC on Facebook  Find us on Twitter

OUR ESSAYS


August 26, 2012

When Universities Raid Their Law Schools

St._Louis_University_Law_School_in_St._Louis_Missouri.jpg

By Charlotte Allen

Earlier this month Annette Clark, dean of Saint Louis University's law school, abruptly resigned from her job via e-mail after only a year. She left after accusing the Jesuit university and its president, Rev. Lawrence Biondi, of looting the law school in order to fund other, non-law-related programs on the Saint Louis campus. 

This was not the first time that a law dean has quit in a dispute over the "tax"-- the premium that law schools and business schools, which typically charge higher tuition than other campus programs, must hand over to their host universities. In July 2011 Philip Closius, dean of the public University of Baltimore School of Law, quit his job under administration pressure after asserting that the university kept--and used for its own purposes--some 45 percent of the revenue that the law school generated from tuition, fees, and state subsidies. In 2009 De Paul University in Chicago fired its then-dean, Paul Weissenberger, apparently because Weissenberger complained to the American Bar Association that De Paul had siphoned off more than the 25 percent of its law school's revenues that the law school had agreed to contribute.

Such departures call into question the universities' widespread practice of using law schools as lucrative cash cows when the bottom is falling out of the market for law-school graduates. This is especially true at lower-tier law schools such as De Paul, Baltimore, and Saint Louis. These schools, whose graduates face increasingly dim chances of securing the highly paid law jobs on graduation that would enable them to repay student loans, currently face declining numbers of applicants. Nonetheless, the schools feel pressured to raise their tuition in order to pay the exactions their universities force upon them. Their deans and administrators are caught in a vise grip: They can't afford to invest in the niche programs that might make them more attractive without raising tuition, but every tuition hike further diminishes their applicant pool. The cash-cow model of exploiting law schools to pay for, say, a new gender studies program in the English department is an impossible situation that can't continue on and thus won't continue.

Clark's letter of resignation listed a number of specific grievances against Biondi, who had hired her away from her longtime previous position as vice dean of the law school at Seattle University. In her resignation e-mail and another letter directed to law school faculty and staff, Clark complained that Biondi and other Saint Louis administrators had abruptly canceled her law school's $30 million fund-raising plan to construct a new building and, without Clark's knowledge or approval, annouced that the school would instead move to a donated office building in downtown St. Louis. She also said that Biondi had transferred $800,000 from the law school's building fund  and $260,000 earmarked for summer research into his discretionary fund.

Biondi refused to comment on the specifics of Clark's charges, but he did write his own Aug. 8 letter to the Saint Louis law faculty stating that he was about to fire Clark anyway over differences concerning administration of the law school. He noted such problems as "a declining number of students applying and enrolling in our law school" and "our decline in national rankings of American law schools." Clark will continue at the law school as a faculty member, not an administrator.

Tuition at Saint Louis's law school for the 2012-13 academic year is $36,440. This is not too much more than the Saint Louis undergraduate tuition of $34,740, but law schools are overall much cheaper to operate than undergraduate programs. Although law faculty are expensive and the American Bar Association demands that law schools maintain large, costly, but obsolete libraries, overhead is otherwise relatively low. Law classes typically take the large-lecture, "Paper Chase" format, written work is minimal, labs are nonexistent, and there is no need for the army of counselors, diversity officers, res-life functionaries, and other administrators who swarm undergraduate education. Law school revenues are thus tempting troughs for university officials to dip into given their own financial pressures. This is especially true at public institutions where state aid has steadily declined.

The problem isn't simply that administrators are killing the goose that lays the golden egg. It's that the goose itself is becoming too sickly to lay anything at many campuses as increasing numbers of prospective students realize that a law degree probably isn't worth the massive debt. New graduates of Saint Louis University's law school, according to the school's own figures, earn a median starting salary of only $60,000--hardly enough to make three years of foregone income worth it, much less repay substantial loans. And that figure only accounts for the mere 53.5 percent of Saint Louis law graduates known to be employed at graduation. There are too many law schools in America because their parent institutions viewed them as a cheap profit centers. Now that times are tough for both law schools and their parent universities, it's not surprising that we're witnessing bitter feelings, charges of exploitation, and disillusioned deans quitting their corner offices.  



Comments (2)

Alphonsus Jr. :

Law school "education" (for it's education only in the most debased sense) as we know it will collapse not primarily for economic reasons, but because of curricular rot and the philosophical impoverishment at its root.

For example, I was lucky enough to attend a law school where a class in legal philosophy (i.e., Jurisprudence) was offered. It was miraculous that such a class was offered at all, but notice this: it was offered only as a) an elective, and b) to 3Ls. Note that marginalization.

We're talking about foundational subject matter - yet it's not offered at most law schools. If it is, as at my school, it's radically marginalized. The tacit message is that it's really not very important, just a way of getting some of those last needed credits.

Throw politically motivated nonsense like classes in Feminist Legal Theory into the mix and you've got a ticking time bomb.

Much more could be mentioned.

All this reflects a toxic shift - characteristic of modernism - from orthodoxy to orthopraxis. The very notion of orthodox is of course anathema under today's dictatorship of relativism. Instead, as told us by certain modern pseudo-philosophies (e.g., Marxism), we're to devote ourselves to orthopraxis. We must remake the world. We must not wait for heaven; we must create heaven on earth. But as Plato taught us, all attempts to do so will instead create hell on earth.

Thus our law schools' descent into the maelstrom.

Once again I'm reminded of this blasted age's epitaph, penned at its very dawn:

Age, thou art shamed.*
O shame, where is thy blush?**

-Shakespeare, Julius Caesar,* Hamlet**

Jeff Krasney:

I strongly suspect that the 53.5% of St. Louis University law school 2011 graduates had jobs lined up as of graduation, and the $60,000 average salary of that 53.5% is also probably not true.

I graduated from the University of Baltimore's law school and I am still involved with that law school. I know that less than 5% of the Class of 2012 at the University of Baltimore got jobs as associates with traditional law firm. Approximately 15% of the class got jobs as law clerks primarily with Circuit Court judges in Maryland. The remaining 80% of the Class is either working as for a very small law firm of less than 5 lawyers or is not working in the law at all. The average compensation for the Class of 2012 during its first year out will be somewhere around $28,000/year. In other words, the average University of Baltimore law school graduate will earn less income during his or her first year post-law school than a year of tuition costs.

I know that the empoloyment situation at the University of Saint Louis cannot be significantly different from the University of Baltimore.

Post a comment

Leave comments here. Unless they are vicious or obscene, they will be printed.


MONTHLY ARCHIVES:

 

RECENT ESSAYS

Do We Over-Invest in Non-Traditional Students?
Richard Vedder

The Liberal Arts Are in Trouble--Should We Celebrate?: Part 2
Symposium

The Liberal Arts Are in Trouble--Should We Celebrate?
Symposium

Walter Russell Mead: The Coming Reformation of Higher Ed


A Sorry Attack on the Common Core
Sol Stern

All Essays >>>

Published by the Manhattan Institute
The Manhattan Insitute's Center for the American University.